9 Apr 2019; DW: A Hong Kong court on Tuesday found the top leaders of the "Umbrella Movement" guilty of conspiracy to commit public nuisance and incitement for their roles in the 2014 pro-democracy demonstrations.
The trial has sparked concerns about the erosion of political freedoms in the semi-autonomous Chinese city.
What we know so far:
- Nine leaders of the protest were on trial, including a retired pastor, professors and student activists, as well as current and former lawmakers.
- Eight members of the group were found guilty of incitement to commit public nuisance.
- Five were found guilty of "incitement to incite" public nuisance.
- The trial included rarely used colonial-era charges that carry jail terms of up to seven years — although no sentences were immediately handed down.
- The judge in the case acknowledged that civil disobedience is "recognized in Hong Kong," but said that it wasn't an adequate defense to criminal charges.
'Continue the struggle for democracy'
Ahead of the verdict, the campaigners vowed to continue pushing for democracy in Hong Kong, regardless of the trial's outcome.
"We will still continue our struggle for democracy," professor Benny Tai told Reuters news agency ahead of the verdict. "The reason that we committed civil disobedience is because we want justice for Hong Kong people."
What were the protests about?
The protests, which were spearheaded by three of the defendants in Tuesday's trial, called for free elections for Hong Kong's leader.
In 2013, former pastor Chu Yiu-ming, law professor Benny Tai, and sociology professor Chan Kin-man, founded the pro-democracy "Occupy Central" movement, which later joined with the student-led Umbrella Movement.
Over the course of the 79-day protests in 2014, mass demonstrations paralyzed Hong Kong's financial district and highlighted widespread frustration over the shrinking of the city's civil liberties.
Concerns over China's influence: Hong Kong enjoys a degree of autonomy and civil liberties that are protected under an agreement between Britain and China. Ever since the city returned from British to Chinese rule in 1997, rights groups have voiced concerns that those freedoms are being eroded under China's influence.
